Rebar Historical Replay: 2023-11 to 2024-05
Replay a 116-day ferrous window from 2023-11-20 to 2024-05-15 as close fell 9.1% into a 16.0% drawdown. Walk each daily bar, hit 20 decision points, and receive an AI coach review on your simulated choices.
116 daily bars · 20 decision points · 2023-11 to 2024-05 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 177 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 16.0% and a 9.5% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −16.0%
- Max run-up
- +9.5%
- Duration
- 177 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.9%
- Bars
- 116 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 20
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Rebar futures found themselves caught in the crosscurrents of 2020s geopolitical turbulence during this 116-trading-day window from 2023-11-20 to 2024-05-15. Red Sea tensions disrupted established supply chains and freight routes, injecting uncertainty into ferrous markets at a time when construction demand was already navigating post-pandemic adjustments. For market participants, this period posed a fundamental question: how does one position defensively when the threat is geopolitical rather than purely economic? The scenario's 20 decision points, of which 7 were flagged as critical, compressed months of real-world ambiguity into an intensive training arc.
The numbers reveal a market under pressure. Rebar closed the period at 3621, down from an opening of 3983—a decline of -9.1%. The journey was anything but smooth: maximum drawdown reached 16.0%, meaning peak-to-trough losses far exceeded the final percentage drop. The largest single-bar move of 2.9% underscores that volatility arrived in concentrated bursts rather than gradual drift. These figures illustrate how headline risk can create sustained directional pressure punctuated by sharp intraday reversals—a pattern that punishes both passive holding and reactive trading without clear process.
This replay teaches that process discipline matters more than directional conviction. Navigating a -9.1% slide with a 16.0% drawdown requires pre-defined entry and exit rules, not post-hoc rationalization. The 7 critical decision points serve as stress tests for risk calibration: Are position sizes appropriate for a 2.9% single-day shock? Does the strategy account for periods where the market offers no clean exit? Practically, this historical window rewards participants who treat geopolitical uncertainty as a risk factor to be sized around, not a signal to act on. The goal is building habits that preserve capital through ambiguity, not genius trades.
Featured in the archive