Skip to main content

Iron Ore Historical Replay: 2014-10 to 2015-04

CommoditiesFerrousUSCrash2014-10 to 2015-04Difficulty 4/5FreeView charts

Replay the 2014–2015 iron ore collapse across 114 daily bars as the price slid from 575 to 378, a 34.3% drawdown. You step through each session, face 20 decision points, and receive AI coach feedback in a simulated educational environment.

114K lines
20Decision points
4Difficulty
DailyGranularity

114 daily bars · 20 decision points · 2014-10 to 2015-04 · Commodities

Key facts

This window spans 170 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 34.3% and a 11.6% run-up.

Max drawdown
−34.3%
Max run-up
+11.6%
Duration
170 days
Largest single-day move
−7.8%
Bars
114 Daily bars
Decision points
20

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The scenario places you in the iron ore market as it entered a severe downturn. By late 2014, commodity prices were under pressure from slowing Chinese demand and rising supply. This replay spans 114 daily bars from 2014-10-21 to 2015-04-09, placing you inside one of the decade's most aggressive ferrous metal collapses.

What unfolded was a sustained price decline. Iron ore fell from 575 to 378, representing a drawdown of 34.3%. The market did not fall in a straight line—volatility was evident, with the largest single-day move reaching 7.8%. Participants faced 20 decision points, including 7 critical moments where positioning could mean the difference between preservation and significant loss. The brutal math of a sustained downtrend tested every aspect of market participation.

This replay is a powerful training ground for several key skills. First, it forces honest engagement with drawdown—34.3% losses are not abstract when you are navigating them bar by bar. Second, it reveals how volatility clusters create both danger and opportunity, as a 7.8% single-bar move can either stop out positions or offer mean-reversion setups. Third, it demands disciplined risk management under pressure, as an extended bear market erodes capital quickly. The psychological dimension is equally important: sustaining focus and process discipline when every bar reinforces the negative trend separates skilled practitioners from those who panic-exit or overstay fatally. This scenario sharpens both the analytical toolkit and the emotional resilience needed to execute a sound plan through adverse conditions.