Skip to main content

Iron Ore Historical Replay: 2025-02 to 2025-08

CommoditiesFerrousUSWar2025-02 to 2025-08Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Replay 120 days of iron ore history from 2025-02-17 to 2025-08-08, when prices fell 4.1% amid a brutal 17.8% drawdown. Step through each session, make decisions at 21 key points, and receive AI coach feedback — simulated capital, purely educational.

120K lines
21Decision points
1Difficulty
DailyGranularity

120 daily bars · 21 decision points · 2025-02 to 2025-08 · Commodities

Key facts

This window spans 172 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 17.8% and a 19.4% run-up.

Max drawdown
−17.8%
Max run-up
+19.4%
Duration
172 days
Largest single-day move
−5.6%
Bars
120 Daily bars
Decision points
21

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

This replay covers iron ore trading from 2025-02-17 to 2025-08-08, a 120-day window spanning the 2020s. Iron ore is a critical input for global steel production, and the period was marked by geopolitical tensions and trade policy uncertainty. Participants in this scenario face the challenge of navigating a market where commodity prices are highly sensitive to macro forces and policy shifts.

Over the course of this period, iron ore closed at 806.5 and ultimately settled at 773.5, representing a decline of 4.1%. The journey was far from smooth—prices experienced a maximum drawdown of 17.8%, and the largest single-day move reached 5.6%. These figures illustrate how sustained volatility can erode positions even when the overall directional move appears modest.

This scenario tests several key competencies: position sizing to withstand a 17.8% drawdown, discipline to avoid reactive decisions during a 5.6% single-bar swing, and the ability to identify critical decision points amid noise. With 21 decision points including 7 critical junctures, participants learn that surviving drawdowns requires both robust risk management and psychological resilience.