Orange Juice Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-01
Replay 126 daily bars of orange juice from 2024-07-18 to 2025-01-15, capturing an 11.3% close swing and a 17.3% max drawdown. Walk through 22 decision points with AI coach review in a simulated, educational training environment.
126 daily bars · 22 decision points · 2024-07 to 2025-01 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 181 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 17.3% and a 33.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −17.3%
- Max run-up
- +33.1%
- Duration
- 181 days
- Largest single-day move
- −10.2%
- Bars
- 126 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 22
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Cocoa Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.5
- Coffee Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.4
- Cotton Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.1
- Sugar Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.3
- Cocoa Historical Replay: 2024-11 to 2025-052024 · Lv.5
- Coffee Historical Replay: 2024-11 to 2025-052024 · Lv.4
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The orange juice futures market entered a pivotal six-month window from July 2024, a period defined by shifting monetary policy expectations and their cascading effects on dollar-denominated soft commodities. The 2024-09 Federal Reserve rate decision loomed large over every trader's calculus, as the anticipated policy pivot carried profound implications for commodity valuations. Against this backdrop, participants faced the delicate task of positioning themselves while managing the inherent volatility of an agricultural market sensitive to both macroeconomic forces and supply dynamics.
The data from this 126-bar replay tells a story of measured gains complicated by turbulent intraperiod swings. Closing prices advanced from 432.35 to 481.2, translating to an 11.3% appreciation over the full span. Yet this seemingly favorable outcome obscures the rough terrain traversed: a maximum drawdown of 17.3% tested conviction, while a single-bar move of 10.2% underscored how quickly positions can be challenged. Across the six months, 22 decision points materialized, with 8 deemed critical enough to require deliberate strategic response.
This replay illuminates why process discipline matters more than outcome chasing. The gap between the 11.3% final return and the 17.3% drawdown reveals the psychological toll of staying the course through adverse periods. Traders confronting a 10.2% single-session shock must decide whether to adhere to pre-established rules or react to short-term pain. Decision training in this environment hones the ability to maintain analytical objectivity when positions are under stress, reinforcing that surviving volatility is often the prerequisite to capturing eventual directional moves.