Cotton Historical Replay: 2016-07 to 2017-01
Replay 122 days of cotton's volatile 2016–2017 stretch, including a 14.8% drawdown and a 4.1% single-session swing. Step through daily decisions across 7 critical inflection points and receive AI coach feedback, with simulated capital only.
122 daily bars · 21 decision points · 2016-07 to 2017-01 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 177 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 14.8% and a 13.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −14.8%
- Max run-up
- +13.4%
- Duration
- 177 days
- Largest single-day move
- +4.1%
- Bars
- 122 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 21
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Cotton futures in the soft commodities complex are notoriously sensitive to weather disruptions, global supply shifts, and currency movements. The period from mid-2016 through early 2017 proved particularly demanding for participants, as the market required navigating 122 trading days while maintaining disciplined risk management through an unpredictable stretch. The scenario recreates this environment where even experienced traders faced the test of staying systematic under pressure.
The replay tracked cotton through a journey that ultimately delivered a net change of just 0.4% (71.95 to 72.27), yet this seemingly benign outcome masks the turbulence encountered along the way. Participants confronted a maximum drawdown of 14.8% and absorbed the impact of a 4.1% single-session move—the kind of volatile swing that can rapidly erode confidence and capital. Across the data span, 21 decision points presented themselves, with 7 critical inflection points demanding clear strategic responses.
This scenario teaches that headline returns rarely reveal the full story of trading difficulty. The chasm between a modest 0.4% final result and the 14.8% drawdown endured during the journey highlights why process consistency and emotional regulation matter as much as market direction. Decision training in this environment hones the ability to execute a predefined plan when volatility threatens discipline, reinforcing that survival through drawdowns is prerequisite to realizing any eventual outcome.
Featured in the archive