WTI Crude Oil Historical Replay: 2021-05 to 2021-08
Replay 64 trading days of WTI crude oil from May to August 2021, when prices swung within a 17.2% drawdown and single bars moved up to 7.5%. Step through each day, tackle 11 decision points, and receive AI coach feedback in a simulated, educational environment.
64 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2021-05 to 2021-08 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 91 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 17.2% and a 18.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −17.2%
- Max run-up
- +18.4%
- Duration
- 91 days
- Largest single-day move
- −7.5%
- Bars
- 64 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Brent Crude Oil Historical Replay: 2022-07 to 2023-012022 · Lv.4
- Heating Oil Historical Replay: 2022-07 to 2023-012022 · Lv.4
- Natural Gas Historical Replay: 2022-07 to 2023-012022 · Lv.5
- RBOB Gasoline Historical Replay: 2022-07 to 2023-012022 · Lv.5
- WTI Crude Oil Historical Replay: 2022-07 to 2023-012022 · Lv.4
- Brent Crude Oil Historical Replay: 2021-05 to 2021-082021 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The scene opens in late May 2021, when WTI crude oil was navigating a complex post-pandemic recovery. Energy markets faced crosscurrents: demand was rebounding unevenly while supply adjustments lagged. For 64 trading days through August, players would manage positions through a period where prices never truly broke out, delivering a -2.0% net decline despite significant intraday turbulence. The stage was set for disciplined risk management under a ceiling of 17.2% maximum drawdown.
What unfolded was a study in volatility without direction. The contract settled at 62.32 from an opening 63.58, but the journey mattered more than the destination. Single sessions produced moves up to 7.5%, testing position sizing and stop-loss discipline. Across 11 decision points, four critical moments demanded traders choose between holding, adjusting, or exiting. The 17.2% drawdown ceiling hung over every commitment, reminding participants that survival in sideways markets requires the same rigor as trending ones.
This replay sharpens three skills essential for any market participant: position sizing under known volatility constraints, emotional regulation when large bars print against you, and systematic review of decisions against outcomes. The absence of a clear trend forces focus on process rather than outcome. Participants learn that a -2.0% result can represent either poor timing or excellent risk management, depending on the decisions made along the way. AI coach feedback transforms each choice into a lesson in self-awareness and continuous improvement.
Featured in the archive