TA-35 Downtrend Replay (2020-06-09 to 2020-06-29)
Replay a 3.6% pullback across the TA-35 from 2020-05-20 to 2020-07-13 and feel the pressure of correction days. You step through each session, make decisions at seven branching points, and receive an AI coach review of your reasoning in this simulated, educational exercise.
30 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2020-05 to 2020-07 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 54 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 9.4% and a 5.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −9.4%
- Max run-up
- +5.4%
- Duration
- 54 days
- Largest single-day move
- +2.9%
- Bars
- 30 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The TA-35, Israel's flagship equity index, enters a testing period. From May 20 to July 13, 2020, traders and investors faced a sustained pullback that would challenge their conviction and discipline. This 30-bar daily dataset captures a market caught between post-pandemic recovery hopes and emerging uncertainty. The question at stake: how would participants manage positions when the index that had powered through the initial COVID shock now faced a measured but persistent decline?
The index closed at 1437.56 on May 20 and ended at 1385.11 by July 13, representing a 3.6% pullback. Yet this headline figure conceals the true pressure—the maximum drawdown reached 9.4%, with individual sessions moving as much as 2.9%. Seven decision points peppered the path, three of them critical junctures where directional conviction was most demanded. The market never collapsed, but it constantly tested resolve through grinding volatility.
This replay trains the muscle that separates experienced practitioners from novices: the ability to distinguish between noise and signal during extended corrections. A 9.4% drawdown tests emotional regulation—the discipline to execute risk protocols without panic or paralysis. Participants learn that surviving corrections is less about predicting directional moves and more about maintaining process integrity under pressure. The psychological dimension is unforgiving: every session asks whether you are managing risk or simply hoping for relief.