TA-35 Downtrend Replay (2015-08-05 to 2015-10-01)
Replay a 58-day Israeli TA-35 correction with a 13.6% peak-to-trough drawdown across authentic 2015 tape. Step through 11 decision points (4 critical), make your calls, then receive an AI coach review of your simulated risk management.
58 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2015-07 to 2015-10 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 111 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 13.6% and a 5.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −13.6%
- Max run-up
- +5.8%
- Duration
- 111 days
- Largest single-day move
- −7.5%
- Bars
- 58 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Israeli TA-35 Index entered a correction phase during the summer of 2015, testing investor resolve across the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. This replay immerses participants in 58 trading days spanning July to October 2015, placing them at 11 decision points—4 of them critical junctures—where market conditions shifted and required deliberate responses. The scenario captures the tension between maintaining conviction and acknowledging deteriorating technical conditions in a mid-cap heavy equity index.
Over the course of this correction, the TA-35 closed the period at 1566.15, down 5.5% from an opening level of 1658.06. The peak-to-trough decline reached 13.6%, while the largest single session move measured 7.5%. These figures illustrate how corrections can produce significant intermediate volatility even when the final outcome appears relatively modest. Participants navigated through authentic daily bars, experiencing the gradual erosion of capital that defines drawdown environments.
The educational value lies not in predicting reversal points but in training response protocols under stress. A 13.6% drawdown tests emotional discipline; a 7.5% single-bar move challenges impulse control. This replay forces participants to confront whether their risk parameters remain viable when volatility spikes and paper losses accumulate. The goal is to internalize decision-making processes that hold up when markets are unkind—building habits that serve through future corrections in any decade.