TA-35 Downtrend Replay (2016-12-28 to 2017-04-13)
Replay 120 daily bars of the TA-35 correction from November 2016 to June 2017 and see how a 6.8% drawdown unfolded. Walk through eleven decision points, make your own calls, then receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
120 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2016-11 to 2017-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 222 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.8% and a 6.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −6.8%
- Max run-up
- +6.6%
- Duration
- 222 days
- Largest single-day move
- +1.9%
- Bars
- 120 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The TA-35 index serves as Israel's primary equity benchmark, and the period from November 2016 to June 2017 presented investors with a textbook correction scenario amid the post-election optimism that had driven markets higher. Over 120 daily bars of authentic market data, participants could feel the tension between the index's broader trajectory and the intermediate pullback that tested conviction. This was a period where the stakes were clear: maintaining exposure through volatility requires discipline, but mistiming entries and exits can transform a normal correction into a painful loss.
The numbers reveal the challenge: starting from 1387.6, the index ultimately closed at 1425.32 for a modest 2.7% gain, yet the journey was far from smooth. A maximum drawdown of 6.8% tested portfolio values, while the largest single-bar move of 1.9% reminded traders that volatility can arrive without warning. Eleven decision points were embedded in this 120-day span, with four marked as critical moments requiring traders to act with conviction or restraint.
This replay teaches that surviving a correction demands more than reading charts. The process of deciding when to hold, reduce, or add exposure becomes the real training ground. Risk management transforms abstract concepts into lived experience, and the psychological dimension reveals whether a trader can maintain composure when drawdowns approach double digits in percentage terms. For anyone building their skills in the 2010s era, this scenario offers a disciplined environment to practice responding to volatility rather than reacting to fear.