Rough Rice Historical Replay: 2021-09 to 2021-12
Replay 64 days of rough rice trading from September to December 2021, watching close climb 6.2% amid regulatory shocks. Step into each session, make your calls at 11 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated performance.
64 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2021-09 to 2021-12 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 90 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.9% and a 12.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −6.9%
- Max run-up
- +12.1%
- Duration
- 90 days
- Largest single-day move
- +2.6%
- Bars
- 64 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Corn Historical Replay: 2022-11 to 2023-052022 · Lv.2
- Live Cattle Historical Replay: 2022-11 to 2023-052022 · Lv.3
- Oats Historical Replay: 2022-11 to 2023-052022 · Lv.3
- Rough Rice Historical Replay: 2022-11 to 2023-052022 · Lv.1
- Soybean Historical Replay: 2022-11 to 2023-052022 · Lv.1
- Soybean Meal Historical Replay: 2022-11 to 2023-052022 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Rough rice occupies a quiet but essential niche in China's agricultural commodity complex. This replay covers 64 daily trading sessions from September 8 to December 7, 2021 — a period when regulatory dynamics and macro uncertainty created sharp inflection points across commodity sectors. Participants step into each trading day, navigating 11 decision points that include 4 critical moments where positioning choices carried amplified consequences for simulated portfolio performance.
The market closed the period at 13.91, rising from an opening of 13.1 and delivering a net gain of 6.2%. Yet the journey was turbulent: the portfolio endured a maximum drawdown of 6.9%, and the largest single-bar move reached 2.6%, illustrating how regulatory signals can spark sudden spikes even within a moderately trending market. These numbers capture both the opportunity and the hazard that defined the era.
For decision training, the scenario tests three core competencies. First, process discipline: participants must articulate entry and exit logic before market noise overwhelms judgment. Second, risk calibration: the 6.9% drawdown reminds us that adverse moves arrive faster than comfort allows, making position sizing and stop-loss adherence non-negotiable. Third, psychology under pressure: the 2.6% single-session shocks demand emotional regulation to avoid reactive selling at lows. This replay does not promise profits — it promises a controlled environment to practice thinking clearly when clarity is hardest to maintain.
Featured in the archive