Iron Ore Historical Replay: 2024-10 to 2025-01
Replay the iron ore market from October 9, 2024 to January 7, 2025, spanning 64 daily bars with an 8.2% max drawdown. Step through each session, tackle 4 critical decision points, and receive AI coach feedback on your simulated choices.
64 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2024-10 to 2025-01 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 90 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.2% and a 11.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −8.2%
- Max run-up
- +11.0%
- Duration
- 90 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.7%
- Bars
- 64 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Coke Historical Replay: 2024-11 to 2025-052024 · Lv.4
- Coking Coal Historical Replay: 2024-11 to 2025-052024 · Lv.4
- Hot-rolled Coil Historical Replay: 2024-11 to 2025-052024 · Lv.2
- Iron Ore Historical Replay: 2024-11 to 2025-052024 · Lv.2
- Rebar Historical Replay: 2024-11 to 2025-052024 · Lv.2
- Coke Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.4
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The iron ore market entered a turbulent four-month period from October 9, 2024 to January 7, 2025, a span that would test even seasoned commodities traders. This was not merely a story of a price hovering near 777.5 but a complex interplay of policy signals, dollar dynamics, and supply-demand recalibrations that unfolded across 64 daily trading sessions. With four critical decision points embedded in this historical replay, participants faced the challenge of navigating an 8.2% maximum drawdown while managing positions through periods of sharp intraday volatility. The stakes were clear: those who misread the macro cues or failed to respect risk parameters would see paper losses compound rapidly.
The closing price shifted from 777.5 to 750, representing a net decline of -3.5% over the full period. Yet this headline figure masks the journey, as the largest single-bar move reached 4.7%, underscoring that individual sessions could deliver outsized shocks relative to the gentle drift of the aggregate trend. An investor who fixated solely on the modest weekly closes would have missed the texture of daily fear and greed that defined this era. The 2020s commodities complex proved once again that the path matters as much as the destination.
This replay distills essential lessons in process over prediction. The 11 decision points scattered across the timeline remind practitioners that market mastery comes not from one bold call but from consistent execution and adaptive risk management. The 4.7% single-session swing serves as a stark reminder that tail risk is not theoretical; position sizing and stop discipline determine survival. Psychologically, the -3.5% outcome paired with an 8.2% drawdown tests a trader's relationship with loss and uncertainty. Educational value lies in confronting those moments without the safety net of real capital, building habits that translate to genuine market resilience.
Featured in the archive