Skip to main content

WTI Crude Oil Historical Replay: 2024-11 to 2025-02

CommoditiesEnergyUSPolicy2024-11 to 2025-02Difficulty 2/5FreeView charts

Replay 62 trading days of WTI crude oil from 2024-11-22, a span shaped by post-election policy shifts that capped drawdowns at 12.0%. Step into 4 critical decision points, navigate daily volatility, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.

62K lines
11Decision points
2Difficulty
DailyGranularity

62 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2024-11 to 2025-02 · Commodities

Key facts

This window spans 94 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 12.0% and a 19.1% run-up.

Max drawdown
−12.0%
Max run-up
+19.1%
Duration
94 days
Largest single-day move
+3.6%
Bars
62 Daily bars
Decision points
11

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

WTI crude oil entered a pivotal period from late November 2024 as post-election policy uncertainty rippled through energy markets. The 62-trading-day span from November 22 to February 24, 2025, captured the market's adjustment to shifting trade, energy, and geopolitical signals emerging from the new administration's agenda. For traders and analysts, this period represented a test of how commodity markets price policy risk in real time.

Over the course of this replay, WTI crude settled at 70.7, slipping 0.8% from the 71.24 opening level. However, this modest net decline masked considerable turbulence—a maximum drawdown of 12.0% tested downside assumptions, while the largest single session move of 3.6% demonstrated how quickly sentiment could shift on policy headlines. Navigating this environment required constant reassessment across the 11 decision points embedded in the scenario, with 4 designated as critical crossroads.

This replay distills lessons in process discipline, risk calibration, and psychological resilience. The 12.0% drawdown underscores the importance of sizing positions relative to maximum plausible adverse moves rather than optimistic scenarios. The 3.6% intraday spikes highlight the danger of overconfident short-term predictions amid policy-driven volatility. Across the 4 critical decision points, participants must confront the cognitive challenge of maintaining probabilistic reasoning when headlines suggest directional momentum. The gap between the mild net outcome and the rough journey in between serves as a reminder that historical accuracy rarely matches the narrative clarity we impose afterward.