Skip to main content

Copper Historical Replay: 2012-11 to 2013-05

CommoditiesBase MetalsCNCrash2012-11 to 2013-05Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Replay a 120-day copper crash from 2012-11-15 to 2013-05-09, marked by an 18.5% peak drawdown. You step through each daily bar, face 21 decision points, and receive an AI coach review in this simulated training scenario.

120K lines
21Decision points
1Difficulty
DailyGranularity

120 daily bars · 21 decision points · 2012-11 to 2013-05 · Commodities

Key facts

This window spans 175 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 18.5% and a 9.6% run-up.

Max drawdown
−18.5%
Max run-up
+9.6%
Duration
175 days
Largest single-day move
+6.8%
Bars
120 Daily bars
Decision points
21

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

In late 2012, copper—a bellwether of global economic health—entered a pronounced downturn that would test every trader navigating its daily fluctuations. This 120-bar replay spans 2012-11-15 to 2013-05-09, placing you inside the crucible of a commodities crash within the broader 2010s market landscape. The stakes were clear: participants had to make real decisions under uncertainty, with positions hanging on each bar's outcome.

The numbers tell a story of volatility consuming capital. Copper closed the period at 3.34, down 3.5% from its 3.46 opening—but peak-to-trough analysis reveals the true stress. The max drawdown reached 18.5%, with the largest single-bar move hitting 6.8%. Across 21 decision points, 7 of which were critical junctures, traders faced moments where a single judgment call could mean the difference between weathering the storm or compounding losses.

This replay excels as a training ground for process discipline. The 18.5% drawdown forces participants to confront position sizing and risk tolerance head-on. Psychology becomes paramount: panic selling near bottoms or overconfidence after brief rallies both destroy edge. The 6.8% single-bar spikes teach emotional regulation—staying rational when the market makes violent moves. For anyone building resilience against market crashes, this scenario distills the essential lesson: survive drawdowns through process, not prediction.