TA-35 Downtrend Replay (2011-07-21 to 2011-08-10)
Replay a 12.8% TA-35 correction across 30 daily bars from July to August 2011. Step through each session, face 3 critical decision points out of 7, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
30 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2011-07 to 2011-08 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 51 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 16.1% and a 5.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −16.1%
- Max run-up
- +5.2%
- Duration
- 51 days
- Largest single-day move
- −5.6%
- Bars
- 30 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the summer of 2011, Israel's benchmark TA-35 index entered a sharp correction phase that tested the resolve of every market participant. Over 30 daily trading sessions spanning from early July through late August, investors witnessed the index retreat from elevated levels amid mounting uncertainty. The scenario recreates this downturn, challenging participants to navigate 7 decision points—3 of which are critical inflection moments—while managing exposure through one of the decade's most volatile periods.
The numbers tell a stark story: the index fell from 1248.63 to 1088.87, representing a -12.8% decline. Peak-to-trough drawdown reached 16.1%, and the largest single trading day saw a 5.6% move, underscoring the intensity of the selloff. These are not abstract statistics but real conditions that investors faced session by session, often with incomplete information and mounting psychological pressure.
This replay session is designed as a training ground for decision-making under stress. Participants must confront questions about risk management, conviction, and emotional discipline when positions turn against them. The distinction between 7 decision points and 3 critical ones mirrors real market conditions—most moments feel routine, but certain inflection points disproportionately shape outcomes. By making choices before knowing the results, participants practice process over prediction, building habits that transfer to future volatility. The 2011 correction serves as a historical case study in navigating sustained adversity with discipline and clarity.