Gold Historical Replay: 2023-03 to 2023-06
Replay 64 days of gold trading from March to June 2023, when a 6.6% drawdown and 2.4% daily swings tested every safe-haven thesis. Step through each decision point, commit your simulated calls, and receive an AI coach review of how you navigated the crisis.
64 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2023-03 to 2023-06 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 92 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.6% and a 5.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −6.6%
- Max run-up
- +5.2%
- Duration
- 92 days
- Largest single-day move
- +2.4%
- Bars
- 64 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In March 2023, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the ensuing turmoil at Credit Suisse shook global markets and placed gold's safe-haven status under its first real test in years. Traders faced a critical question: would traditional safe-haven demand override the pressure from dollar strength and rising rates? Over the following months, this 64-day window became a live laboratory for stress-testing conviction.
The period from March 22 to June 22 saw gold's price drift from 1946.8 to 1912.7, a modest -1.8% net decline that obscures the true turbulence beneath the surface. The market endured a maximum drawdown of 6.6% and witnessed single-bar moves as large as 2.4%, with 11 distinct decision points—4 of which proved critical—demanding traders reassess their positions repeatedly. The apparent flatness of the final outcome masks a far more volatile internal journey.
This replay teaches that crisis conditions rarely follow textbook narratives. A -1.8% net result does not mean the path was calm; it means the forces balanced in the end. Decision training here focuses on managing through a 6.6% drawdown, distinguishing signal from noise when a 2.4% single-day swing occurs, and holding process discipline across four critical junctures where conviction was truly tested. The lesson is not about predicting the next crisis but about building the psychological resilience to execute decisions under sustained uncertainty.