Skip to main content

MSCI ACWI Uptrend Replay (2025-04-08 to 2026-02-25)

StocksMSCI ACWIUSBoom2025-05 to 2025-12Difficulty 2/5FreeView charts

Replay 150 daily bars from May to December 2025 as the MSCI ACWI climbs 14.2%. Walk through each authentic decision point and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.

150K lines
11Decision points
2Difficulty
DailyGranularity

150 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2025-05 to 2025-12 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 216 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 5.0% and a 15.8% run-up.

Max drawdown
−5.0%
Max run-up
+15.8%
Duration
216 days
Largest single-day move
−2.6%
Bars
150 Daily bars
Decision points
11

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

This scenario replays 150 daily bars of the MSCI ACWI from May 29, 2025 through December 31, 2025, inviting participants to navigate a sustained global equity advance during the 2020s. The market environment presented the classic challenge of maintaining disciplined positioning through an extended uptrend while resisting the psychological temptation to overtrade or second-guess a clear direction. Participants faced 11 decision points, including 4 critical moments that tested their ability to execute a coherent strategy under varying conditions.

Over the 150-day data span, the MSCI ACWI rose from 123.91 to 141.49, delivering a cumulative return of 14.2%. The journey was not linear: the market experienced a maximum drawdown of 5.0% and a largest single-bar move of 2.6%, creating moments of uncertainty within an otherwise constructive backdrop. These intraperiod setbacks served as stress tests, forcing participants to decide whether short-term pressure warranted tactical adjustments or whether the broader thesis remained intact.

This replay teaches that disciplined process matters more than outcome prediction in trending markets. The 14.2% gain was achievable through patient positioning, yet the 5.0% drawdown demanded psychological resilience. Four critical decision points highlighted the tension between staying the course and reacting to volatility. For training purposes, the scenario illustrates that managing risk during calm periods and maintaining conviction through minor pullbacks are equally important skills for any market participant seeking to build durable decision-making frameworks.