EUR/CHF Historical Replay: 2018-07 to 2018-10
Replay EUR/CHF across 64 daily bars from 2018-07-09 to 2018-10-04, absorbing a 4.3% drawdown. You step through 11 decision points in simulated capital as the Turkish and Argentine crises shook emerging markets.
64 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2018-07 to 2018-10 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 87 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 4.3% and a 2.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −4.3%
- Max run-up
- +2.0%
- Duration
- 87 days
- Largest single-day move
- −1.1%
- Bars
- 64 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- AUD/USD Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- GBP/USD Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- NZD/USD Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- USD/CHF Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- USD/JPY Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- AUD/CHF Historical Replay: 2018-08 to 2018-112018 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The EUR/CHF cross sits at the heart of European financial stability, and from 2018-07-09 to 2018-10-04, traders faced 64 daily bars of escalating uncertainty. This period coincided with the Turkish lira collapse and the Argentine peso crisis, both of which rippled through G10 currencies as investors sought safe-haven flows. Eleven decision points were embedded in this replay, four of which were critical junctures where positioning and risk management made the difference between preserving capital and compounding losses.
The replay delivered a net decline of -2.0% from an opening close of 1.1655 to a closing level of 1.1418, but the journey was far more volatile than the headline number suggests. The maximum drawdown reached 4.3%, meaning positions experienced significant stress before recovering. The largest single-bar move of 1.1% on any given day could have wiped out weeks of incremental gains, reminding traders that tail events define survival more than average conditions.
This replay teaches that crisis management is less about predicting direction and more about building processes that absorb volatility without breaking. The 11 decision points train traders to reassess exposure when news flow accelerates and to question whether their risk models account for correlated G10 moves during EM contagion. Psychological discipline matters most when drawdowns approach historical extremes, and this 2010s scenario offers a disciplined framework for confronting that pressure without abandoning sound risk principles.
Featured in the archive