USD/CHF Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-01
Replay USD/CHF across 130 daily bars from July 2019 to January 2020, navigating a 3.3% drawdown amid repo-market stress. Walk through 23 decision points, including 8 critical ones, with AI coach feedback in a simulated educational environment.
130 daily bars · 23 decision points · 2019-07 to 2020-01 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 182 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 3.3% and a 3.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −3.3%
- Max run-up
- +3.2%
- Duration
- 182 days
- Largest single-day move
- −1.2%
- Bars
- 130 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 23
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The USD/CHF pair sits at the crossroads of the world's reserve currency and the traditional safe-haven franc. The replay window from July 2019 to January 2020 captures a period when repo-market stress rippled through funding channels, creating unusual turbulence in G10 forex even as headlines focused elsewhere. For traders, this was a test of vigilance: navigating a currency pair that rarely commands front-page attention but can shift sharply when dollar funding tightens.
Over 130 daily bars, the pair descended from 0.988 to 0.9707, a modest -1.8% decline that conceals a rougher journey. The maximum drawdown reached 3.3%, and the largest single-bar move of 1.2% reminds us that trend statistics never tell the full story. Participants faced 23 decision points, with 8 classified as critical moments where directional conviction and risk calibration were simultaneously tested.
This replay teaches that volatility is as much a psychological test as a market phenomenon. When drawdown deepens and liquidity conditions shift, the gap between a disciplined process and reactive trading widens. The scenario invites reflection on position sizing, the emotional weight of consecutive decisions, and the discipline required to maintain conviction when conditions turn hostile. It is a reminder that consistent execution under uncertainty is the foundation of resilient trading behavior, not the prediction of any single outcome.
Featured in the archive