CHF/JPY Historical Replay: 2006-02 to 2006-08
Replay 130 daily CHF/JPY bars spanning 2006-02-15 to 2006-08-14, when a 4.2% climb disguised a 3.3% drawdown. Step through 23 decision points day by day, get AI coach feedback on each choice, and learn the carry-trade era in simulated capital only.
130 daily bars · 23 decision points · 2006-02 to 2006-08 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 180 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 3.3% and a 7.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −3.3%
- Max run-up
- +7.2%
- Duration
- 180 days
- Largest single-day move
- +1.4%
- Bars
- 130 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 23
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
CHF/JPY in early 2006 was caught in the crosscurrents of the global carry trade era. The Swiss franc, traditionally a safe-haven currency, and the Japanese yen, a low-yield funding currency, were interacting in a period when interest rate differentials across G10 nations were driving massive capital flows. The market from 2006-02-15 to 2006-08-14 presented traders with a seemingly straightforward scenario—a modest upward drift that concealed more turbulent undercurrents. This was a period when many assumed that carry trades would continue their relentless march higher, yet the reality demanded constant vigilance.
The pair climbed from 89.97 to 93.71, delivering a 4.2% return that appeared respectable on the surface. Yet this gain was not a smooth ascent but rather a journey marked by a 3.3% peak-to-trough drawdown and sudden 1.4% single-bar moves that could quickly erode confidence. Across 23 decision points—8 of which were critical—the market tested the resolve of anyone expecting linear returns. The real story lay in the divergence between headline performance and the internal volatility that accompanied it.
This replay sharpens the ability to trade against apparent trends. The lesson is not about predicting direction but about managing the gap between expectation and reality. Trainees must learn to size positions knowing that a 3.3% drawdown can materialize even when the net outcome looks benign. They must also steel themselves for liquidity-driven spikes that can arrive without warning in forex markets. In the carry-trade era of the 2000s, discipline and process trumped directional conviction.
Featured in the archive