AUD/JPY Historical Replay: 2006-02 to 2006-08
Replay 130 daily bars of AUD/JPY from February to August 2006, capturing a 6.1% drawdown during the global carry-trade bubble. Step through each authentic trading day, face 23 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
130 daily bars · 23 decision points · 2006-02 to 2006-08 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 180 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.1% and a 8.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −6.1%
- Max run-up
- +8.0%
- Duration
- 180 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.1%
- Bars
- 130 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 23
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In early 2006, the AUD/JPY cross represented one of the most traded carry-trade pairs in the G10 forex market. The six-month window from February 15 to August 14, 2006, captured a particularly volatile phase of the global carry-trade bubble, where interest rate differentials between the Australian dollar and the Japanese yen attracted massive capital flows. For traders navigating this market, the challenge was not simply directional conviction but managing the violent two-way swings that characterize crowded positioning in a macro trade.
The data reveals a market that went nowhere fast in aggregate yet frightened its participants along the way. Over 130 daily bars, the cross closed at 88.67 versus an opening of 87.15, delivering a modest 1.7% return. Yet this journey included a maximum drawdown of 6.1% and a largest single-bar move of 2.1%, meaning participants faced repeated episodes of sharp adverse movement that tested conviction. Across the period, 23 decision points punctuated the daily flow, with 8 classified as critical junctions where directional bias, risk sizing, or timing choices carried heightened consequence.
This replay teaches that surviving a bubble environment requires separating outcome from process. The 1.7% net gain was barely visible against the 6.1% drawdown backdrop, yet both are authentic data points from the same series. Decision trainers practicing here learn to evaluate whether their simulated choices maintained disciplined risk sizing when drawdowns hit, whether they stayed anchored to analysis rather than reacting to noise, and how their psychology responded when a 2.1% intraday move arrived unexpectedly. The carry-trade era remains a masterclass in volatility management.
Featured in the archive