Skip to main content

Copper Historical Replay: 2015-11 to 2016-05

CommoditiesBase MetalsCNPolicy2015-11 to 2016-05Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Replay 122 trading days across 2015-11 to 2016-05 as copper navigated a 9.6% drawdown and policy-driven volatility. Step through each session, make decisions at 21 key points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated reasoning.

122K lines
21Decision points
1Difficulty
DailyGranularity

122 daily bars · 21 decision points · 2015-11 to 2016-05 · Commodities

Key facts

This window spans 177 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 9.6% and a 18.0% run-up.

Max drawdown
−9.6%
Max run-up
+18.0%
Duration
177 days
Largest single-day move
+3.4%
Bars
122 Daily bars
Decision points
21

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

In the autumn of 2015, base metals markets faced a pivotal transition as China signaled a decisive shift toward supply-side reform. Copper, a bellwether for industrial demand, found itself at the crossroads of slowing growth and policy intervention. Over the next six months, market participants would confront a complex interplay of macroeconomic headwinds and government-driven restructuring initiatives. This replay captures that tension across 122 trading days, inviting traders to experience the uncertainty that defined the era.

The numbers reveal a market searching for direction: copper closed the period at 2.07, down 1.9% from its 2.11 opening, while experiencing a maximum drawdown of 9.6%. The largest single session moved 3.4%, underscoring the volatility that policy announcements could trigger. Participants who underestimated these swings, or failed to position for policy-driven inflection points, faced significant tracking error against the market.

This scenario trains decision-makers to think probabilistically under structural uncertainty. With 21 decision points embedded across the replay, including 7 critical junctures, traders must practice calibrating conviction versus hedging. The 9.6% drawdown serves as a stark reminder that risk budgets require discipline even in range-bound markets. Psychological resilience—sticking to process when a single session moves 3.4%—separates those who learn from history from those who repeat it.