Energy Sel SPDR Downtrend Replay (2022-06-08 to 2022-06-23)
Replay a 15.7% slide in the Energy Select SPDR across 30 daily bars from May 24 to July 7, 2022. You move bar-by-bar, face 7 decision points including 3 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review of every call.
30 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2022-05 to 2022-07 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 44 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 25.7% and a 9.5% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −25.7%
- Max run-up
- +9.5%
- Duration
- 44 days
- Largest single-day move
- −5.6%
- Bars
- 30 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Energy Sel SPDR Downtrend Replay (2020-08-12 to 2020-10-01)2020 · Lv.4
- Energy Sel SPDR Downtrend Replay (2019-12-23 to 2020-03-12)2019 · Lv.5
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2022-07-04 to 2022-10-31)2022 · Lv.1
- Consumer Disc SPDR Downtrend Replay (2022-03-29 to 2022-05-24)2022 · Lv.4
- Energy Sel SPDR Downtrend Replay (2016-12-13 to 2017-08-17)2016 · Lv.2
- Hang Seng Tech Downtrend Replay (2022-08-26 to 2022-10-03)2022 · Lv.4
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Energy Select SPDR entered a turbulent stretch in late May 2022 as crude oil markets faced mounting uncertainty and the broader equity rally showed signs of fatigue. Investors in this sector ETF were navigating a complex environment where macroeconomic signals, Federal Reserve policy tightening, and volatile commodity prices converged to create elevated risk. The replay spans 30 daily bars, placing participants at the heart of real decision moments during a period when energy equities were under severe pressure.
What unfolded over the data window was a sustained downtrend: the closing price fell from 42.12 to 35.49, representing a cumulative decline of 15.7%. The journey included a maximum drawdown of 25.7% from peak to trough, and the most aggressive single-session move reached 5.6%. Participants faced seven distinct decision points throughout this stretch, with three of them marked as critical junctures where positioning choices carried heightened consequence.
The scenario tests several core competencies: disciplined risk management under drawdown conditions, the ability to distinguish between noise and signal in a volatile sector, and psychological resilience when facing consecutive losing periods. Navigating a 25.7% drawdown without abandoning process is far harder than it appears on paper. This replay does not promise outcomes—it sharpens the habits and mental frameworks that separate methodical participants from reactive ones.