Hang Seng Tech Downtrend Replay (2022-08-26 to 2022-10-03)
Replay a brutal 28.4% drawdown on the Hang Seng Tech Index across 52 authentic trading days from August to October 2022. Step through each session, face 9 decision points including 3 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
52 daily bars · 9 decision points · 2022-08 to 2022-10 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 73 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 28.4% and a 7.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −28.4%
- Max run-up
- +7.4%
- Duration
- 73 days
- Largest single-day move
- +7.4%
- Bars
- 52 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 9
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the summer of 2022, Hong Kong's technology sector faced mounting headwinds as regulatory concerns, slowing global growth, and geopolitical tensions converged. The Hang Seng Tech Index, a concentrated barometer of China's leading internet and technology companies, entered a period of acute distress. Investors and traders following this market faced a critical question: how do you navigate an environment where the structural backdrop is shifting beneath your feet? This replay scenario places you in the cockpit during 52 authentic trading sessions spanning August through October of that year, with 9 decision points—including 3 that demand immediate tactical responses—to test your ability to adapt.
What unfolded was a brutal 28.4% drawdown from the starting close of 4.29 to a trough of 3.07 across those 52 daily bars. The index did not decline in a straight line; rather, volatility punctuated the descent with a largest single-bar move of 7.4%, creating moments of false recovery that tempted entry and deepened losses for those caught wrong-footed. The magnitude and persistence of this drawdown distinguished it from routine corrections, placing it squarely in crash territory by any historical measure.
This scenario trains your eye on three essential dimensions: process discipline under sustained pressure, risk calibration when drawdowns exceed comfort thresholds, and psychological management when each new bar potentially deepens pain. The 9 decision points simulate moments where holding, reducing exposure, or repositioning all carried plausible but divergent outcomes. There are no perfect answers—only a more honest reckoning with how you actually behave when a 28.4% loss is no longer hypothetical.