Regulation · Straits Times Index (2021)
Replay 144 daily bars across the Straits Times Index from late 2020 through early 2021, a stretch that delivered an 11.2% climb yet a 3.0% single-day jolt. Step through each session, weigh 25 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2020-12 to 2021-07 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 209 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 5.2% and a 14.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −5.2%
- Max run-up
- +14.2%
- Duration
- 209 days
- Largest single-day move
- +3.0%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Regulation · Straits Times Index (2020)2020 · Lv.2
- Commodity Shock · Straits Times Index (2022)2021 · Lv.1
- War · Straits Times Index (2022)2021 · Lv.1
- Pandemic · Straits Times Index (2022)2021 · Lv.2
- Inflation · Straits Times Index (2021)2021 · Lv.1
- Pandemic · Straits Times Index (2021)2021 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Straits Times Index, Singapore's benchmark equity gauge, entered a pivotal phase in late 2020. As the world navigated the pandemic's aftermath, the STI offered investors a window into how a small-open economy responded to extraordinary policy shifts and market volatility. The period from December 10, 2020 to July 7, 2021 placed traders at the intersection of post-COVID recovery, central bank posture, and regional economic reopening.
Across 144 daily bars, the index climbed from 2824.96 to 3141.6, delivering an 11.2% gain. Yet the journey proved far rougher than the headline number suggests. A maximum drawdown of 5.2% tested conviction, while a single session saw a jarring 3.0% swing that could unsettle even seasoned participants. The disparity between steady accumulation and sudden dislocation created 25 decision points, with 9 deemed critical junctures where a misstep could materially alter outcomes.
This replay sharpens the ability to maintain discipline when volatility erupts without warning. Participants learn that headline returns can mask psychological strain, and that managing drawdown risk matters more than chasing peak-to-trough gains. The scenario trains emotional equilibrium—recognizing when market moves reflect noise versus signal—and reinforces that sound process, not prediction, defines long-term resilience in the 2020s market environment.