War · Straits Times Index (2022)
Replay the Straits Times Index through 144 daily bars from 2021-10-26 to 2022-05-24, when geopolitical shocks pulled the index from 3204.57 to 3195.04. Step into 25 decision points across the war era and receive AI coach feedback in a fully simulated market.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2021-10 to 2022-05 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 210 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.5% and a 13.3% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −8.5%
- Max run-up
- +13.3%
- Duration
- 210 days
- Largest single-day move
- −3.4%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Straits Times Index entered the final quarter of 2021 at elevated levels, with global markets already navigating pandemic recovery and early signs of inflation pressure. The 144-day replay window from 2021-10-26 to 2022-05-24 captures a period when geopolitical tensions escalated into open conflict, forcing investors to process sudden, unpredictable shocks while markets adjusted to a new risk landscape.
The index closed the period nearly flat, slipping from 3204.57 to 3195.04, a marginal decline of -0.3%. Yet this headline figure obscures significant turbulence beneath the surface: a maximum drawdown of 8.5% tested portfolio resilience, while the largest single trading day delivered a 3.4% swing. Across 25 decision points—9 deemed critical—participants faced repeated scenarios where calm analysis competed with the emotional weight of breaking headlines.
This replay sharpens decision training on three fronts. First, it exposes the danger of anchoring to initial prices when geopolitical events render traditional valuation frameworks incomplete. Second, it demands strict drawdown management, as an 8.5% peak-to-trough decline can rapidly test risk tolerance. Third, it pressures the psychological discipline required to distinguish signal from noise when headlines scream crisis but index-level damage proves limited. Successful navigation of this era required balancing geopolitical awareness with the composure to avoid reactive selling at market bottoms.