Sugar Historical Replay: 2020-02 to 2020-05
Replay sugar futures through the 2020 pandemic crash as crude dropped 30.3% from 14.73 to 10.27 in just 64 daily bars. Step through each day, face 4 critical decision points, and receive an AI coach review in this simulated training environment.
64 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2020-02 to 2020-05 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 91 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 41.6% and a 19.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −41.6%
- Max run-up
- +19.1%
- Duration
- 91 days
- Largest single-day move
- +6.5%
- Bars
- 64 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Sugar futures traders entering February 2020 faced an unprecedented test. The market had been trading in familiar ranges, but the spreading pandemic was about to reshape global commodity demand. For 64 daily bars spanning from early February to early May, participants would navigate the sharpest sugar decline in recent memory, with each trading day presenting new challenges to their discipline and risk management.
The closing price collapsed from 14.73 to 10.27, a decline of 30.3% over the period. Maximum drawdown reached 41.6%, while the largest single-bar move hit 6.5%, underscoring the volatility that characterized every session. Traders confronted 11 decision points across the replay, with 4 critical moments demanding immediate choices. These numbers reveal a market where momentum shifted rapidly and the margin for error evaporated.
This scenario teaches that surviving extreme drawdowns demands more than directional conviction. The sequence of decision points, especially the four critical ones, illustrates how compounding losses erode judgment and test commitment to pre-defined rules. Participants learn that managing risk through a prolonged decline, rather than timing its bottom, separates disciplined practitioners from those who simply react to price movement.
Featured in the archive