Orange Juice Historical Replay: 2015-11 to 2016-04
Replay 100 trading days across 2015-11 to 2016-04 in orange juice, navigating a 27.1% drawdown and sharp 7.1% swings. Step through each daily bar, tackle 6 critical decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated historical choices.
100 daily bars · 17 decision points · 2015-11 to 2016-04 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 147 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 27.1% and a 29.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −27.1%
- Max run-up
- +29.4%
- Duration
- 147 days
- Largest single-day move
- +7.1%
- Bars
- 100 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 17
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Coffee Historical Replay: 2015-11 to 2016-052015 · Lv.3
- Cotton Historical Replay: 2015-11 to 2016-052015 · Lv.1
- Sugar Historical Replay: 2015-11 to 2016-052015 · Lv.3
- Cocoa Historical Replay: 2015-06 to 2015-122015 · Lv.1
- Coffee Historical Replay: 2015-06 to 2015-122015 · Lv.2
- Cotton Historical Replay: 2015-06 to 2015-122015 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The backdrop was orange juice futures on the 2010s soft commodities desk, spanning 100 daily bars from 2015-11-09 to 2016-04-04. During this window, the Federal Reserve moved to raise interest rates in December 2015, propelling the US dollar to multi-year highs. For soft commodity traders, dollar strength typically translates into headwinds, and orange juice was no exception. The scenario places participants directly into this environment of policy-driven market stress, where they must navigate positions while absorbing the impact of a stronger currency on soft commodity valuations.
The numbers reveal a market in flux despite modest overall direction. Prices advanced from 139.25 to 143.7, capturing a mere 3.2% gain—but this figure obscures the turbulence beneath. A maximum drawdown of 27.1% tested portfolio discipline, while a single session saw a 7.1% swing that could have triggered margin calls or forced exits for the unwary. Across the 100 daily bars, participants faced 17 decision points, with 6 deemed critical to the outcome.
The replay's core value lies in its emphasis on process over prediction. Trainees encounter a market delivering relatively flat returns through extreme volatility, requiring disciplined risk management when facing 27.1% drawdowns and the discipline to navigate sharp single-bar moves without emotional overreactions. This historical period serves as a practical case study in maintaining strategy consistency during policy-driven uncertainty, regardless of whether the ultimate result proves profitable or loss-making.
Featured in the archive