Skip to main content

KOSPI 200 Downtrend Replay (2024-07-11 to 2024-08-05)

StocksKOSPI 200KRCorrection2024-06 to 2024-08Difficulty 2/5FreeView charts

Replay a KOSPI 200 downtrend from June to August 2024 with a maximum drawdown of 16.8%, testing your decision-making under genuine correction conditions. Work through 7 decision points day by day and receive an AI coach review of each choice in a fully simulated, educational environment.

36K lines
7Decision points
2Difficulty
DailyGranularity

36 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2024-06 to 2024-08 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 50 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 16.8% and a 10.9% run-up.

Max drawdown
−16.8%
Max run-up
+10.9%
Duration
50 days
Largest single-day move
−9.2%
Bars
36 Daily bars
Decision points
7

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The KOSPI 200 faced a significant correction episode spanning 36 trading days from June 27 to August 16, 2024. As South Korea's flagship large-cap equity index, the KOSPI 200 serves as a primary benchmark for domestic institutional and retail participants. This replay scenario drops you into a live market environment where a -3.7% overall decline masks far more turbulent underlying dynamics—a genuine stress test for decision-makers managing positions through a deteriorating trend.

Price action during this period delivered a maximum drawdown of 16.8%, with individual sessions swinging as sharply as 9.2% in a single bar. The index moved from a close of 38320 down to 36890 over the full data window. Seven decision points were embedded throughout the correction, three of which the scenario flags as critical junctures where directional conviction and risk calibration were most severely challenged.

For decision training purposes, this replay illustrates that correction environments punish both passive inertia and reflexive capitulation. The 9.2% single-day volatility episodes demand disciplined process over impulse, while the 16.8% peak-to-trough exposure tests emotional equilibrium under sustained pressure. Navigating such periods requires separating temporary dislocation from structural impairment—exactly the judgment call this scenario is designed to exercise.