Rough Rice Historical Replay: 2010-05 to 2010-08
Replay 64 days of rough rice trading from May 2010, when prices slid 10.6% amid European sovereign-debt stress. You will move day by day through this historical grain-market crisis, face 4 critical decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your choices using simulated capital only.
64 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2010-05 to 2010-08 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 91 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 22.7% and a 17.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −22.7%
- Max run-up
- +17.0%
- Duration
- 91 days
- Largest single-day move
- +4.1%
- Bars
- 64 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The summer of 2010 found commodity markets navigating one of the decade's most turbulent periods for European sovereign debt. Rough rice, a grain contract that rarely commands headlines, became a quiet stage for the ripple effects of fiscal stress spreading from Athens to broader markets. This replay spans 64 daily bars from May 21 to August 20, placing you inside the grain pits as uncertainty colored every price tick.
The numbers tell a story of sustained pressure. Rough rice closed the period at 10.91, down 10.6% from its 12.2 opening—a modest decline that masked a deeper journey. The market experienced a maximum drawdown of 22.7%, meaning peak-to-trough losses far exceeded the final outcome. At its worst, a single trading day moved prices by as much as 4.1%, creating sharp intraday tests of discipline and risk management.
This replay teaches that surviving volatile markets requires more than reading price direction. The gap between the final 10.6% loss and the 22.7% drawdown reveals how temporary swings can test conviction even when the ultimate outcome seems manageable. With 11 decision points including 4 critical moments, participants practice balancing analysis with flexibility, learning that process and psychology matter as much as picking the right direction.