AUD/JPY Historical Replay: 2025-11 to 2026-05
Trade the full 128-day AUD/JPY war replay as it surged 13.4% from 100.941 to 114.492. You step through daily decisions across 22 turning points, get an AI coach review, and learn risk timing with simulated capital only.
128 daily bars · 22 decision points · 2025-11 to 2026-05 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 180 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 3.5% and a 13.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −3.5%
- Max run-up
- +13.7%
- Duration
- 180 days
- Largest single-day move
- +2.0%
- Bars
- 128 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 22
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In November 2025, the AUD/JPY cross entered a period defined by geopolitical conflict, placing traders in one of the G10 forex market's most volatile operating environments. The 128-day replay window from 2025-11-14 to 2026-05-13 captured a full cycle of uncertainty, risk-on repositioning, and the gradual repricing that accompanies sustained tension between trading nations.
The numbers tell a story of directional conviction. AUD/JPY rose 13.4% from 100.941 to 114.492 over the period, yet this trajectory was far from smooth. A maximum drawdown of 3.5% punctuated the advance, while the largest single daily move reached 2.0%. Across 22 decision points—8 deemed critical by the simulation framework—traders were forced to navigate whipsaws, manage exposure, and choose between staying the course and adapting positions.
For decision trainees, this replay distills the core challenge of volatile market engagement: separating signal from noise under pressure. The 3.5% drawdown tested conviction; the 2.0% daily spikes demanded discipline in position sizing. Success here depended less on predicting direction and more on executing a consistent process—pre-defining entries, exits, and risk thresholds before the emotional weight of each bar became apparent.