USD/CHF Historical Replay: 2023-11 to 2024-05
Replay USD/CHF across 132 daily bars from November 2023 to May 2024, capturing a 6.7% drawdown and 1.4% single-bar spike amid Red Sea tensions. You step through each session, tackle 23 decision points, and receive an AI coach review in a simulated educational environment.
132 daily bars · 23 decision points · 2023-11 to 2024-05 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 182 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.7% and a 9.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −6.7%
- Max run-up
- +9.4%
- Duration
- 182 days
- Largest single-day move
- +1.4%
- Bars
- 132 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 23
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The USD/CHF pair entered the final quarter of 2023 against a backdrop of escalating Red Sea tensions, a geopolitical fault line that would test currency markets throughout the early months of 2024. This 132-bar daily replay spans from November 14, 2023 to May 14, 2024, placing traders inside one of the decade's more volatile G10 forex environments. With Swiss safe-haven flows in tension against dollar dynamics, the stage was set for a complex navigation of geopolitical risk events.
Over the six-month period, USD/CHF closed at 0.9012 and exited at 0.9067, a modest 0.6% appreciation that belied the turbulence beneath the surface. The maximum drawdown of 6.7% revealed the depth of sentiment swings as geopolitical headlines shifted, while a largest single-bar move of 1.4% captured moments of acute market dislocation. Traders faced 23 decision points across the replay, with 8 deemed critical junctures where directional conviction and risk calibration mattered most.
This replay sharpens decision training in three dimensions. First, process discipline: navigating 23 distinct choice moments demands consistent methodology rather than reactive improvisation. Second, risk calibration: a 6.7% drawdown tests position sizing and exposure management frameworks under stress. Third, psychological resilience: the gap between modest net results and violent intermediate swings reveals how geopolitical noise distorts perception, making emotional discipline as critical as technical analysis for sustainable decision-making.