Skip to main content

CHF/JPY Historical Replay: 2018-04 to 2018-07

ForexG10 MajorsTRCrisis2018-04 to 2018-07Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Step into a 66-day CHF/JPY historical replay spanning April to July 2018, where price closed 111.49 to 111.605 amid a 2.9% drawdown. Replay each session, tackle 12 decision points including 4 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review in a simulated, educational setting.

66K lines
12Decision points
1Difficulty
DailyGranularity

66 daily bars · 12 decision points · 2018-04 to 2018-07 · Forex

Key facts

This window spans 91 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 2.9% and a 3.0% run-up.

Max drawdown
−2.9%
Max run-up
+3.0%
Duration
91 days
Largest single-day move
−1.0%
Bars
66 Daily bars
Decision points
12

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The CHF/JPY pair entered a tense period from April to July 2018 as emerging-market contagion fears rippled through G10 currencies. This 66-day replay captures daily positioning decisions during a phase when the Turkish lira crisis was unfolding, creating subtle but real volatility dynamics in traditionally stable crosses. Traders faced the challenge of reading cross-currency flows without the benefit of knowing how the situation would resolve.

The data reveals a market that moved surprisingly little on balance: the close shifted from 111.49 to 111.605, a mere 0.1% gain over the full period. Yet this apparent calm masked intraday turbulence, with the largest single-bar move reaching 1.0% and maximum drawdown hitting 2.9%. These figures underscore how sideways markets can punish volatility exposure even when directional trends fail to materialize. Navigating such environments required discipline around position sizing and an awareness that range-bound price action rarely stays tame indefinitely.

This replay places you at 12 decision points, including 4 critical junctures where directional bias could have been severely tested. The scenario trains your process in managing risk when macro headlines suggest volatility but price action remains contained. It is a study in patience, position management, and the psychological discipline required to avoid overtrading in markets that reward stillness as much as action.