CHF/JPY Historical Replay: 2018-04 to 2018-07
Step into a 66-day CHF/JPY historical replay spanning April to July 2018, where price closed 111.49 to 111.605 amid a 2.9% drawdown. Replay each session, tackle 12 decision points including 4 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review in a simulated, educational setting.
66 daily bars · 12 decision points · 2018-04 to 2018-07 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 91 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 2.9% and a 3.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −2.9%
- Max run-up
- +3.0%
- Duration
- 91 days
- Largest single-day move
- −1.0%
- Bars
- 66 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 12
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- AUD/USD Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- GBP/USD Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- NZD/USD Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- USD/CHF Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- USD/JPY Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- AUD/CHF Historical Replay: 2018-08 to 2018-112018 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The CHF/JPY pair entered a tense period from April to July 2018 as emerging-market contagion fears rippled through G10 currencies. This 66-day replay captures daily positioning decisions during a phase when the Turkish lira crisis was unfolding, creating subtle but real volatility dynamics in traditionally stable crosses. Traders faced the challenge of reading cross-currency flows without the benefit of knowing how the situation would resolve.
The data reveals a market that moved surprisingly little on balance: the close shifted from 111.49 to 111.605, a mere 0.1% gain over the full period. Yet this apparent calm masked intraday turbulence, with the largest single-bar move reaching 1.0% and maximum drawdown hitting 2.9%. These figures underscore how sideways markets can punish volatility exposure even when directional trends fail to materialize. Navigating such environments required discipline around position sizing and an awareness that range-bound price action rarely stays tame indefinitely.
This replay places you at 12 decision points, including 4 critical junctures where directional bias could have been severely tested. The scenario trains your process in managing risk when macro headlines suggest volatility but price action remains contained. It is a study in patience, position management, and the psychological discipline required to avoid overtrading in markets that reward stillness as much as action.
Featured in the archive