Skip to main content

USD/KRW Historical Replay: 2022-01 to 2022-05

ForexEmerging MarketsRUWar2022-01 to 2022-05Difficulty 2/5FreeView charts

Replay the 2022 USD/KRW war shock across 72 daily bars from Jan 28 to May 8, with a 5.5% close-to-close swing and 13 decision points to navigate. You step through each session, make calls, then receive an AI coach review in a fully simulated educational environment.

72K lines
13Decision points
2Difficulty
DailyGranularity

72 daily bars · 13 decision points · 2022-01 to 2022-05 · Forex

Key facts

This window spans 100 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 2.7% and a 6.7% run-up.

Max drawdown
−2.7%
Max run-up
+6.7%
Duration
100 days
Largest single-day move
−1.5%
Bars
72 Daily bars
Decision points
13

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The USD/KRW pair entered early 2022 as geopolitical flashpoints in Eastern Europe began commanding global market attention. This replay spans 72 daily bars from January 28 to May 8, placing you inside the turbulence that followed when Russia invaded Ukraine. It was a test of how traders process sudden geopolitical shocks in an emerging-market currency closely tied to global risk appetite and supply chains.

The pair moved from 1203.46 to 1270.13, a 5.5% depreciation of the won over the period. The overall move masks a more complex picture: a maximum drawdown of 2.7% and a largest single-bar move of 1.5% indicate that daily volatility was significant even as the cumulative trend remained directional. Across these 72 sessions, 13 decision points were embedded—5 deemed critical—forcing traders to commit positions, adjust hedges, or stand aside at moments when the path forward was far from obvious.

For decision training, this scenario isolates the challenge of operating under geopolitical uncertainty where fundamentals are secondary to headlines. The process lesson centers on sizing: a 1.5% single-bar move demands position discipline that prevents any one wrong call from derailing the portfolio. Psychologically, participants must confront the temptation to over-trade during war coverage and instead practice the patience required to let macro themes resolve on their own timeline. Surviving these sessions teaches that capital preservation during crisis often matters more than capturing directional alpha.