CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2023-04-18 to 2023-05-31)
Replay a 58-day CSI 300 correction where the index slipped from 4.01 to 3.94, an 8.4% drawdown. Step through each daily bar, face 11 decision points, and get an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
58 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2023-03 to 2023-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 85 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.4% and a 4.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −8.4%
- Max run-up
- +4.7%
- Duration
- 85 days
- Largest single-day move
- −1.7%
- Bars
- 58 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2023-01-30 to 2023-03-16)2022 · Lv.1
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2024-12-12 to 2025-01-13)2024 · Lv.1
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2021-05-27 to 2021-07-27)2021 · Lv.1
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2025-03-14 to 2025-04-07)2025 · Lv.1
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2026-06-22 to 2026-07-17)2026 · Lv.3
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2018-02-26 to 2018-07-05)2018 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The CSI 300 entered a correction phase between late March and mid-June 2023, presenting a complex test of risk management and decision-making under sustained downward pressure. Over a 58-day period, the index moved through multiple phases of decline and partial recovery, creating 11 decision points where investors had to choose between holding, adjusting, or repositioning. Four of these moments proved critical to outcomes.
The index slipped from 4.01 to 3.94, representing a modest -1.7% net decline, yet the real challenge lay in the path: an 8.4% maximum drawdown tested portfolio resilience, with the largest single daily move reaching 1.7%. This asymmetry between headline loss and actual volatility became the defining characteristic of the period.
For decision training, this correction illustrates that managing through volatility requires discipline beyond simple entry and exit timing. The sequence of moves—some sharp, some gradual—demanded continuous reassessment of risk tolerance and position sizing. Four critical junctures forced explicit choices about exposure and conviction, turning market correction into a practical laboratory for developing systematic responses to uncertainty.