CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2018-02-26 to 2018-07-05)
Replay a 150-day CSI 300 correction that shed 20.3% from 4.19 to 3.34, with a 24.1% max drawdown shaping every decision. Walk through each daily bar, face 11 decision points, and receive AI coach feedback on simulated choices only.
150 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2018-01 to 2018-08 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 223 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 24.1% and a 8.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −24.1%
- Max run-up
- +8.0%
- Duration
- 223 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.5%
- Bars
- 150 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2018-09-28 to 2018-10-18)2018 · Lv.2
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2018-08-27 to 2018-09-12)2018 · Lv.1
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2016-11-29 to 2017-05-10)2016 · Lv.2
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2021-05-27 to 2021-07-27)2021 · Lv.1
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2023-01-30 to 2023-03-16)2022 · Lv.1
- CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2015-06-08 to 2015-06-19)2015 · Lv.5
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In early 2018, the CSI 300 entered a sustained correction that would test every investor's discipline and decision-making framework. This replay spans 150 trading days, from January through mid-August, and presents participants with 11 decision points—including 4 critical junctures—where strategic choices could mean the difference between preserving capital and compounding losses. The scenario is designed to simulate real pressure without real stakes.
The index declined from 4.19 to 3.34, representing a 20.3% loss over the period. What made this correction particularly challenging was not merely the aggregate decline but the underlying volatility: a maximum drawdown of 24.1% tested portfolio endurance, while the largest single-day move of 4.5% introduced sudden reversals that could trigger emotional responses. Participants who held static positions through the full drawdown faced significant paper losses, while those who acted rashly at market bottoms locked in losses unnecessarily.
This replay distills lessons in three essential areas: process discipline during extended downturns, risk management when drawdowns exceed expectations, and psychological resilience when facing a market that falls further than anticipated. The 11 decision points force deliberate engagement with uncertainty—participants cannot simply set and forget, but must continuously reassess position sizing, timing, and conviction. The educational value lies not in predicting market direction but in building the frameworks and emotional regulation needed to navigate whatever conditions emerge.