Skip to main content

Shanghai, China Historical Replay: 2021-02 to 2023-07

PropertyCity IndexCNCrash2021-02 to 2023-07Difficulty 2/5FreeView charts

Relive 30 monthly bars of a Chinese city property market that gained 10.0% between February 2021 and July 2023 with zero drawdown. You replay the era day by day, face 6 decision points, and receive an AI coach review in a simulated educational environment.

30K lines
6Decision points
2Difficulty
monthlyGranularity

30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2021-02 to 2023-07 · Property

Key facts

Max run-up
+10.0%
Largest single-month move
+0.7%
Bars
30 Monthly bars
Decision points
6

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

This scenario replays thirty monthly bars of a Chinese city property market from February 2021 to July 2023, a period when global rate hikes were expected to pressure real estate valuations. You enter an environment where conventional macro wisdom suggested caution, yet the data reveals a different story. Six decision points, two marked critical, test your ability to read shifting conditions and manage risk through uncertainty.

What unfolded was a steady climb rather than the anticipated pullback. The market advanced from 103 to 113.3, delivering a 10.0% return across the full span. Most striking, the maximum drawdown measured 0.0%, meaning prices never retreated from their rising baseline. The largest single monthly move registered just 0.7%, reflecting extraordinary consistency. Every bar closed above the previous trough, creating a remarkably smooth trajectory that confounded recessionary forecasts.

For decision training, this replay illustrates the cost of acting on expectation rather than evidence. Participants who positioned defensively based on macro fears missed steady appreciation. The scenario teaches disciplined position sizing, the value of holding when fundamentals support the trade, and the psychological discipline required when consensus views fail to materialize. Zero drawdown reminds us that not all volatile-tagged periods deliver the turbulence we anticipate.