New York Historical Replay: 2020-10 to 2023-03
Replay thirty monthly bars from October 2020 to March 2023 across a 27.0% property-cycle climb in a major U.S. city. Walk the chart day by day, face six decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your choices. Simulated capital, educational use only.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2020-10 to 2023-03 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 2.0% with a 28.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −2.0%
- Max run-up
- +28.1%
- Largest single-month move
- +2.0%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- US 10-City Composite Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
- US 20-City Composite Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
- Atlanta Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
- New York Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
- San Francisco Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.4
- Minneapolis Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
This scenario places you inside a U.S. city property market navigating a 27.0% cyclical climb across thirty monthly bars from October 2020 to March 2023. You encounter six decision points, two of them critical, without the benefit of hindsight. The stakes are clear: interpret evolving data in real time, manage directional exposure through a period that would define urban property dynamics in the 2020s, and let your process—not your memory of what happened—guide each choice.
The market rose from a close of 216.55 to 274.99, a 27.0% cumulative advance. Yet the journey was not a smooth ascent. The maximum drawdown registered just 2.0%, and the largest single-bar move also hit 2.0%—a remarkably compressed volatility profile that nonetheless contained six moments demanding strategic response. Each monthly bar arrived with its own texture, and participants who mistook calm for certainty faced the same consequences as those caught off guard by the two inflection points that most tested their directional conviction.
The replay teaches that disciplined process outweighs prediction. Even contained drawdowns demand respect for risk management, and six decision points across thirty bars remind us that patience and timing are inseparable. This is decision training, not forecasting—the goal is to surface the habits that survive real uncertainty, not to recreate a favorable outcome after the fact. Simulated capital, educational framing only.
Featured in the archive