New York Historical Replay: 2020-02 to 2022-07
Replay a New York property cycle from February 2020 to July 2022, watching prices climb 36.1% across 30 monthly bars. You make calls at 6 decision points, including 2 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review of each simulated move.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2020-02 to 2022-07 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 0.1% with a 36.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −0.1%
- Max run-up
- +36.1%
- Largest single-month move
- +2.1%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- US 10-City Composite Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
- US 20-City Composite Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
- Atlanta Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
- New York Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
- San Francisco Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.4
- Minneapolis Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2023-042020 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
This replay immerses you in the New York city property market across the 2020s, spanning February 2020 to July 2022. Thirty monthly bars capture a cycle where prices rose steadily, rewarding patience and disciplined timing. Six decision points—including two marked as critical—punctuate the run, asking you to commit or hold as the market evolved. The scenario forces you to weigh local market dynamics against broader economic uncertainty, with no easy answers about when to act.
The numbers tell a story of sustained ascent: prices climbed from 203.86 to 277.45, a 36.1% gain over the full period. Volatility was remarkably subdued, with a maximum drawdown of just 0.1% and a largest single monthly move of only 2.1%. This was not a dramatic boom-and-bust but a grinding, consistent climb—one that tested whether you could stay the course or recognize when momentum was shifting.
For decision training, this cycle exposes how a quiet, trending market can breed complacency. The tiny drawdown and modest monthly swings may lull a participant into underestimating risk or delaying necessary adjustments. The two critical decision points demand clear process thinking: What validates the trend? What signals exhaustion? The psychological lesson is that steady gains require as much discipline as spectacular ones, and that small, quiet markets still demand full attention to avoid costly surprises.