Shanghai, China Historical Replay: 2017-03 to 2019-08
Replay 30 monthly bars from March 2017 to August 2019 across a Chinese property market scenario with only a 0.8% max drawdown and 6 decision points. Step into each historical bar, face 2 critical choices, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated decisions.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2017-03 to 2019-08 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 0.8% with a 2.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −0.8%
- Max run-up
- +2.2%
- Largest single-month move
- +0.6%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Between March 2017 and August 2019, Chinese property markets navigated a period of relative stability after years of rapid appreciation. This 30-bar monthly replay places you in the shoes of an investor managing exposure through the 2010s, facing six decision points including two critical junctures where directional conviction would be tested. The scenario captures a market in consolidation, where the specter of previous cycles still influenced sentiment but price action remained contained.
The numbers tell a story of unusual calm. Prices moved from 185.21 to 187.99, a modest 1.5% gain over the full period. The maximum drawdown never exceeded 0.8%, and the largest single monthly candle represented just 0.6% of value. For a market segment that had delivered dramatic swings in prior years, this two-and-a-half-year window offered very different conditions: tight ranges, minimal volatility, and limited room for error on either side of the market.
This replay challenges participants to develop discipline in environments that offer few obvious opportunities. Low volatility scenarios test whether traders can resist forcing action when the market itself provides little direction. The two critical decision points become lessons in patience, position sizing, and the psychological cost of overtrading. Completing this scenario teaches that survival and steady decision-making often matter more than dramatic moves when markets enter quiet phases.
Featured in the archive