Shanghai, China Historical Replay: 2017-01 to 2019-06
Replay 30 monthly bars of 中国上海 property history from January 2017, where the index edged from 185.02 to 187.61 with just a 0.8% max drawdown. You will walk through each decision point, then receive an AI coach review of your choices in this simulated, educational environment.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2017-01 to 2019-06 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 0.8% with a 2.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −0.8%
- Max run-up
- +2.0%
- Largest single-month move
- +0.6%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Beijing, China Historical Replay: 2017-12 to 2020-052017 · Lv.2
- Shanghai, China Historical Replay: 2017-12 to 2020-052017 · Lv.1
- Beijing, China Historical Replay: 2017-03 to 2019-082017 · Lv.1
- Shanghai, China Historical Replay: 2017-03 to 2019-082017 · Lv.1
- Beijing, China Historical Replay: 2017-01 to 2019-062017 · Lv.1
- Beijing, China Historical Replay: 2018-11 to 2021-042018 · Lv.5
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Shanghai's property market in early 2017 presented a fascinating paradox. After years of torrid gains, the market had entered a phase of extraordinary compression where the index moved barely a step from 185.02. This replay session walks through 30 monthly bars spanning January 2017 to June 2019, a period that tested participants' ability to navigate extreme price stability in what many still considered a structural bull market. The stakes were high: maintaining discipline when the market offers almost no movement, and resisting the psychological pull of complacency.
The numbers tell a story of remarkable restraint. Across the entire 30-month period, the index closed at just 187.61, representing a mere 1.4% gain. The maximum drawdown of 0.8% and the largest single-bar move of 0.6% reveal a market operating with extraordinary tightness. Six decision points were embedded in this span, with two deemed critical. For anyone replaying this era, the challenge was not spotting explosive opportunities but rather adapting to an environment where traditional momentum strategies had almost nothing to work with.
This scenario serves as a powerful reminder that low volatility itself carries risk. Participants training on this replay must confront the psychological difficulty of staying engaged when the market offers minimal feedback. The compressed range tested discipline around position sizing, the temptation to force action, and the importance of process over outcome. Learning to recognize when the market is telling you there is nothing to do is as valuable as learning when to act.