Boston Historical Replay: 2011-03 to 2013-08
Replay Boston property prices across 30 monthly bars from 2011-03 to 2013-08, where the index climbed 14.2% from 147.33 to 168.26. You make six decision points, receive AI coach feedback, and learn through simulated capital only.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2011-03 to 2013-08 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.3% with a 15.3% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −6.3%
- Max run-up
- +15.3%
- Largest single-month move
- +2.6%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- US 10-City Composite Historical Replay: 2011-03 to 2013-082011 · Lv.2
- US 20-City Composite Historical Replay: 2011-03 to 2013-082011 · Lv.3
- San Francisco Historical Replay: 2011-03 to 2013-082011 · Lv.4
- San Diego Historical Replay: 2011-03 to 2013-082011 · Lv.3
- New York Historical Replay: 2011-03 to 2013-082011 · Lv.2
- Minneapolis Historical Replay: 2011-03 to 2013-082011 · Lv.4
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Boston property market in early 2011 sat at a fragile crossroads. After the turbulence of the previous decade, prices had stabilized but uncertainty lingered. Investors and analysts watched monthly data closely, weighing signs of sustainable recovery against the risk of another downturn. This 30-month replay spans 2011-03 to 2013-08, placing you in the role of an observer and decision-maker navigating a market finding its footing in the early 2010s.
Over the replay period, the Boston index rose 14.2%, climbing from 147.33 to 168.26. Yet the path was not straight. The market experienced a maximum drawdown of 6.3%, and the largest single-bar move measured just 2.6%. These figures reveal a market that advanced steadily but with hesitation, rewarding patience while punishing those who overcommitted on short-term volatility.
This scenario offers six decision points, two of them critical moments where conviction and timing mattered most. The modest single-bar volatility teaches discipline in position sizing, while the drawdown tests emotional resilience. The real lesson is not predicting the direction of a recovering market but managing risk and psychology when prices oscillate in a narrow band. Participants learn to distinguish between noise and signal, building habits that transfer to any market environment.
Featured in the archive