Atlanta Historical Replay: 2004-06 to 2006-11
Replay 30 monthly bars of an Atlanta city housing bubble window from June 2004 to November 2006, posting a modest 10.4% close-to-close gain with only a 0.8% max drawdown. Walk through six decision points as a decision-training scenario with simulated capital, then receive an AI coach review.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2004-06 to 2006-11 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 0.8% with a 11.3% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −0.8%
- Max run-up
- +11.3%
- Largest single-month move
- +1.1%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The replay transports participants to Atlanta's city-level housing market during the 2000s, specifically a 30-month window from June 2004 to November 2006 that captured a notable urban housing bubble. The scenario offers six decision points, including two marked as critical, for participants to navigate using simulated capital. This historical window invites traders to experience firsthand the dynamics that characterized this particular city market during a period often cited in real estate history.
Over the 30 monthly bars, the market delivered a modest 10.4% close-to-close appreciation, with prices moving from 121.49 to 134.18. Strikingly, the maximum drawdown throughout this period was minimal at just 0.8%, and the largest single monthly move registered only 1.1%. These statistics reveal a contained price range with limited volatility, presenting a nuanced challenge for participants who might have expected more dramatic fluctuations typical of bubble narratives.
The scenario teaches valuable lessons in risk management and psychological discipline. With such subdued volatility and minimal drawdowns, participants must resist the temptation to overtrade or assume excessive risk in search of larger gains. The two critical decision points test one's ability to maintain process discipline when market signals are gentle rather than dramatic. Success here lies not in heroic action but in measured, thoughtful responses that protect capital while remaining engaged with an evolving market structure.