San Diego Historical Replay: 2003-06 to 2005-11
San Diego property prices climbed 51.5% from June 2003 to November 2005 across 30 monthly bars, with zero drawdown and a peak monthly swing of 3.7%. Replay this bubble window day by day, navigate six decision points, and receive AI feedback in a fully simulated educational environment.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2003-06 to 2005-11 · Property
Key facts
- Max run-up
- +51.5%
- Largest single-month move
- +3.7%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- US 10-City Composite Historical Replay: 2003-06 to 2005-112003 · Lv.3
- US 20-City Composite Historical Replay: 2003-06 to 2005-112003 · Lv.3
- Seattle Historical Replay: 2003-06 to 2005-112003 · Lv.3
- Boston Historical Replay: 2003-06 to 2005-112003 · Lv.3
- San Francisco Historical Replay: 2003-06 to 2005-112003 · Lv.3
- Minneapolis Historical Replay: 2003-06 to 2005-112003 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The San Diego property market entered a remarkable phase in June 2003, at the tail end of a broader subprime lending boom that had begun around 2000. Over the next 30 months, through November 2005, housing prices in this coastal California city became a focal point for understanding how speculative fervor can drive asset values to extraordinary heights. This historical window presents traders and analysts with a contained period to examine bubble dynamics without the benefit of hindsight.
Prices rose from 165.26 to 250.34, representing a 51.5% increase across these 30 monthly bars. The most striking feature of this ascent was the complete absence of drawdown—zero percent—meaning every monthly close stood above the previous one. The largest single-month move reached just 3.7%, suggesting a steady, grinding climb rather than explosive parabolic extension. This combination of substantial gains with minimal volatility created an almost irresistible narrative of effortless wealth accumulation.
The scenario places learners at six decision points, including two critical moments where positioning choices carry heightened consequence. Navigating this window tests a trader's ability to maintain analytical discipline when fundamentals appear irrelevant and prices ascend monotonically. The lesson is not about predicting the top but about examining how sustained optimism warps risk perception, how the absence of visible losses breeds complacency, and how the decision to act—or refrain—in a frictionless uptrend reveals underlying conviction and process discipline that hindsight alone cannot teach.
Featured in the archive