Copper Historical Replay: 2025-06 to 2025-09
Replay 68 daily bars of copper from June to September 2025, when price slipped from 4.86 to 4.5 amid 25.3% peak drawdown volatility. Step through decision points day-by-day and receive AI coach review in a simulated, educational market-replay environment.
68 daily bars · 12 decision points · 2025-06 to 2025-09 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 97 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 25.3% and a 20.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −25.3%
- Max run-up
- +20.8%
- Duration
- 97 days
- Largest single-day move
- −22.3%
- Bars
- 68 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 12
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Copper Historical Replay: 2025-07 to 2025-102025 · Lv.4
- Copper Historical Replay: 2022-05 to 2022-082022 · Lv.4
- Copper Historical Replay: 2022-04 to 2022-072022 · Lv.4
- Copper Historical Replay: 2020-11 to 2021-052020 · Lv.4
- Copper Historical Replay: 2021-10 to 2022-012021 · Lv.2
- Copper Historical Replay: 2021-11 to 2022-022021 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The copper market in the 2020s faced a challenging inflation-driven environment from June to September 2025. This historical replay covers 68 daily bars of price action, presenting traders with 12 decision points—4 of them critical turning moments—where positioning and risk management would be tested. The period demanded careful calibration between macroeconomic pressures and commodity-specific supply-demand dynamics.
Price action during this span told a story of sustained weakness: copper slipped from 4.86 to 4.5, representing a -7.4% decline. The market experienced a maximum drawdown of 25.3%, with the largest single-bar move reaching 22.3%—a magnitude that could devastate unhedged or oversized positions. These figures underscore the volatility inherent in base metals during uncertain economic regimes.
For decision training, the central lesson is about process over prediction. Navigating a -7.4% macro decline with 25.3% peak drawdown demands disciplined entry rules, position sizing, and predefined exit strategies rather than reactive adjustments. The 22.3% single-bar episode reminds traders that tail risks materialize; psychological resilience and adherence to risk frameworks become the difference between absorbing a loss and a catastrophic drawdown. This replay hones the ability to execute a sound plan when the market tests resolve.