Wheat Historical Replay: 2009-02 to 2009-08
Replay the 2009 wheat boom across 126 daily bars where prices swung 7.8% in a single session. Walk through each market day, weigh 22 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated trades.
126 daily bars · 22 decision points · 2009-02 to 2009-08 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 181 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 28.6% and a 37.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −28.6%
- Max run-up
- +37.6%
- Duration
- 181 days
- Largest single-day move
- −7.8%
- Bars
- 126 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 22
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In early 2009, the global grains market faced extraordinary uncertainty as post-financial crisis conditions reshaped commodity trading dynamics. This scenario replays wheat futures across 126 daily bars from 2009-02-13 to 2009-08-13, immersing participants in a period when supply concerns and macroeconomic shifts collided. The stakes were substantial: participants must navigate this volatile environment across 22 decision points, with 8 of them critical junctures that could determine whether one emerged intact or suffered significant losses.
The wheat market delivered a punishing lesson in volatility. Prices ultimately declined from 535.5 to 481.5, representing a -10.1% loss over the six-month period. Yet the headline return obscures the turbulence within: the largest single-bar move reached 7.8%, while the maximum drawdown hit 28.6%, meaning participants who mistimed entries or failed to manage position size faced capital erosion far exceeding the final percentage loss.
This replay hones decision-making under conditions where information is ambiguous and emotions run high. The gap between headline performance and actual trading experience—the 28.6% drawdown against a -10.1% close—teaches that process matters more than outcome. Participants learn to respect position sizing, set predefined exit levels, and maintain psychological discipline when markets move against them. The 22 decision points across the 2000s era create repeated opportunities to practice these habits until they become instinctive.
Featured in the archive