Natural Gas Historical Replay: 2013-06 to 2013-09
Replay the summer 2013 natural gas tape across 72 daily bars, watching price slip from 3.73 to 3.49 with an 18.4% drawdown. Step through each session, face 13 decision points including 5 critical ones, and receive AI coach review in this simulated educational environment.
72 daily bars · 13 decision points · 2013-06 to 2013-09 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 103 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 18.4% and a 15.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −18.4%
- Max run-up
- +15.8%
- Duration
- 103 days
- Largest single-day move
- +5.0%
- Bars
- 72 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 13
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The summer of 2013 found natural gas markets navigating a complex backdrop of policy uncertainty and broad commodity weakness. As macroeconomic signals shifted and the Federal Reserve signaled potential policy changes, energy markets faced crosscurrents that tested even seasoned participants. Natural gas, as a key heating and power-generation commodity, moved through this environment while traders balanced fundamental supply-demand dynamics against broader market sentiment. The stage was set for a demanding period that would reveal how decisions unfold when the tape offers no easy answers.
Tracking 72 daily bars from June 14 to September 25, 2013, natural gas prices descended from 3.73 to 3.49, representing a decline of 6.4%. Yet the headline figure obscures the journey: the market endured an 18.4% maximum drawdown, with a single session capable of delivering a 5.0% move. Thirteen decision points punctuated the period, five of which rose to critical importance where positioning and risk management choices carried amplified consequences. Every session demanded fresh assessment as the tape tested conviction and discipline.
This replay offers more than historical observation—it is a laboratory for decision training under sustained pressure. Participants confront the challenge of maintaining process discipline when price action trends against them, managing drawdowns without abandoning sound principles. The psychology of loss aversion and the temptation to average down find no refuge here. By replaying critical moments and receiving coach review, learners develop the emotional equilibrium and risk calibration that separate reactive participants from those who navigate volatility with intention.
Featured in the archive