Consumer Disc SPDR Uptrend Replay (2011-10-03 to 2011-10-27)
Replay a 38-day stretch where the Consumer Discretionary SPDR edged from 18.85 to 19.07, absorbing a 10.2% drawdown and a 3.5% single-bar jolt. Walk through seven decision points day by day and receive AI coach feedback on your simulated choices.
38 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2011-09 to 2011-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 51 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 10.2% and a 18.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −10.2%
- Max run-up
- +18.0%
- Duration
- 51 days
- Largest single-day move
- −3.5%
- Bars
- 38 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Consumer Disc SPDR Uptrend Replay (2011-03-16 to 2011-05-10)2011 · Lv.1
- Consumer Disc SPDR Uptrend Replay (2012-06-01 to 2012-09-19)2012 · Lv.1
- Consumer Disc SPDR Uptrend Replay (2013-08-27 to 2013-12-31)2013 · Lv.2
- Consumer Disc SPDR Uptrend Replay (2009-10-28 to 2010-01-07)2009 · Lv.1
- Consumer Disc SPDR Uptrend Replay (2014-10-15 to 2014-12-29)2014 · Lv.2
- Consumer Disc SPDR Uptrend Replay (2014-04-11 to 2014-09-05)2014 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In late September 2011, the Consumer Discretionary SPDR (XLY) entered a demanding 38-day trading window through November 9th. This period fell squarely within the turbulent post-crisis recovery of the 2010s, when markets grappled with lingering European debt anxieties and uneven economic signals. Investors faced the challenge of navigating a sector known for sensitivity to consumer confidence while absorbing macro shocks—a true test of disciplined decision-making under uncertainty.
The data reveals a market that ultimately eked out a modest 1.2% gain, with the close moving from 18.85 to 19.07. Yet this headline figure obscures considerable turbulence beneath the surface: the ETF absorbed a 10.2% maximum drawdown and endured a single-bar move of 3.5%. Across seven decision points—three deemed critical by the scenario designers—participants were forced to react to shifting momentum and volatility spikes while maintaining their strategic positioning.
This replay hones several core competencies. First, it exposes the psychological difficulty of holding positions through a 10.2% drawdown when the eventual outcome is merely a 1.2% gain—highlighting how interim losses can test conviction. Second, it presents the challenge of responding to sudden 3.5% single-bar movements without abandoning a sound process. Third, it illustrates that seven distinct choice points, including three critical inflection moments, demand consistent application of risk and position management principles rather than reactive adjustments.