Technology Sel SPDR Uptrend Replay (2022-01-27 to 2022-02-09)
Replay 30 daily bars of the Technology Select Sector SPDR from 2022-01-11, navigating a 12.7% drawdown across this educational scenario. Step through each session, face 7 decision points including 3 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
30 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2022-01 to 2022-02 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 43 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 12.7% and a 8.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −12.7%
- Max run-up
- +8.4%
- Duration
- 43 days
- Largest single-day move
- +4.4%
- Bars
- 30 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Technology Sel SPDR Uptrend Replay (2021-10-04 to 2021-12-10)2021 · Lv.2
- Technology Sel SPDR Uptrend Replay (2022-11-03 to 2022-12-01)2022 · Lv.3
- Technology Sel SPDR Uptrend Replay (2022-03-14 to 2022-03-29)2022 · Lv.2
- Technology Sel SPDR Uptrend Replay (2024-09-06 to 2024-12-16)2024 · Lv.2
- Technology Sel SPDR Uptrend Replay (2019-06-03 to 2019-07-24)2019 · Lv.1
- Technology Sel SPDR Uptrend Replay (2025-12-17 to 2026-01-28)2025 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The replay centers on the Technology Select Sector SPDR (XLK) during one of its most challenging stretches in the early 2020s. Beginning on 2022-01-11, this 30-day scenario places participants directly into a period when the tech-heavy ETF faced mounting macro headwinds. Navigating 30 daily bars through an unfamiliar landscape, decision-makers must read evolving price action without the benefit of hindsight, confronting uncertainty in real time.
What unfolded was a sustained downtrend: the close fell from 83.97 to 73.62, a decline of -12.3%. The max drawdown hit 12.7%, with the largest single-bar move reaching 4.4% — moments that tested discipline and risk calibration. Across the span, participants encountered 7 decision points, 3 of them critical junctures where directional conviction and position management mattered most.
This scenario sharpens decision training by stripping away post-hoc rationalization. Learners face the psychological friction of holding through drawdown, the timing pressure at inflection points, and the process discipline required when volatility spikes. It is a classroom for humility, not predictions — building the habits that separate deliberate practitioners from reactive ones.