TA-35 Uptrend Replay (2021-03-04 to 2021-06-14)
Replay Israel's TA-35 from January 14 to July 28, 2021, spanning 108 daily bars and 11 decision points across a 5.9% close-to-close move. Step through each session, make your own calls at the four critical forks, and receive an AI coach review of your decision-making. Simulated capital, educational use only.
108 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2021-01 to 2021-07 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 195 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 5.7% and a 10.9% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −5.7%
- Max run-up
- +10.9%
- Duration
- 195 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.7%
- Bars
- 108 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- TA-35 Uptrend Replay (2022-06-16 to 2022-08-24)2022 · Lv.1
- TA-35 Uptrend Replay (2019-06-03 to 2019-08-01)2019 · Lv.1
- TA-35 Uptrend Replay (2023-06-01 to 2023-07-19)2023 · Lv.1
- TA-35 Uptrend Replay (2017-08-10 to 2018-01-29)2017 · Lv.1
- TA-35 Uptrend Replay (2026-03-30 to 2026-05-25)2026 · Lv.1
- TA-35 Uptrend Replay (2016-02-11 to 2016-04-19)2016 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The TA-35, Israel's benchmark stock index, provides the backdrop for this market replay spanning January 14 to July 28, 2021. Over 108 daily trading sessions, participants encounter 11 decision points—including 4 critical forks—within a sustained uptrend. The scenario captures the tension between maintaining conviction during a rally and managing the inherent risks that accompany rising prices. What was truly at stake was developing the discipline to navigate multiple inflection points without allowing momentum to cloud judgment or erode risk controls.
The authentic price data reveals a close-to-close advance of 5.9%, taking the index from 1593.64 to 1687.29. The journey, however, was far from linear: a maximum drawdown of 5.7% tested even patient participants, while the largest single-bar move of 2.7% demanded real-time assessment of whether momentum was extending or exhausting. These numbers frame a market environment where directional bias favored buyers, but volatility still demanded respect for position sizing and exit discipline.
This replay hones decision-making under conditions that reveal more about psychology than technical analysis. The challenge lies not in identifying the trend—visually obvious in hindsight—but in executing consistently when every winning trade tempts a trader to increase risk. The 4 critical forks become case studies in managing conviction versus caution. Ultimately, the scenario teaches that surviving a 5.7% drawdown during a 5.9% rally requires the same process rigor as navigating more volatile periods. Simulated capital, educational framing only.