Bubble · Straits Times Index (2024)
Between November 2023 and June 2024, the Straits Times Index climbed 6.2% from 3135.32 to 3330.77 amid tech and AI valuation concerns. Replay each daily bar, navigate 25 decision points, and receive AI coach feedback in this simulated historical scenario.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2023-11 to 2024-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 211 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 4.2% and a 9.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −4.2%
- Max run-up
- +9.2%
- Duration
- 211 days
- Largest single-day move
- +1.5%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Straits Times Index entered November 2023 navigating one of the most complex speculative environments in recent memory. As AI-driven valuations inflated technology sectors globally, the Singapore market faced mounting concerns about asset bubbles forming in tech and artificial intelligence plays. Between November 2023 and June 2024, a 144-trading day window presented investors with 25 decision points—9 deemed critical—forcing participants to constantly reassess positioning amid valuation uncertainty. This replay captures that tension, placing decision-makers inside the historical market experience rather than observing it from a distance.
The index ultimately climbed from 3135.32 to 3330.77, delivering a 6.2% return that appeared modest relative to the underlying volatility. The journey included a 4.2% maximum drawdown and a 1.5% largest single-bar move—periods when momentum shifted sharply and positioning decisions carried amplified consequences. For those navigating the scenario in real time, the gap between entry and exit proved far less important than the quality of each intermediate judgment call.
This replay teaches that bubble-adjacent environments demand both process discipline and psychological resilience. Participants learn to manage positions when valuations stretch beyond traditional metrics, to respect drawdown limits without panic, and to maintain decision quality across 25 distinct choice points. The 2020s market has consistently rewarded those who separate noise from signal—a skill this scenario hones through authentic historical complexity.